Post by Silicone a Samaroony on Feb 22, 2007 19:49:18 GMT -7
I heard how "great" little miss sunshine was from several (evidently unreliable) sources and when I watched it I was severely dissappointed. Similar to Napolean Dynamite, it was a boring ass movie with a low budget, with the climax of the movie being a silly/sexual dance scene at the end. I would NEVER watch it a second time. People just like it because it's cool to like it, because the "cool kids" like it. Like all the posers that love Donnie darko, (except Donnie Darko is actually a good movie), but the majority of the yuppies who talk about how good it is didn't even get it, they just knew it was cool to like the movie.
I have two words for snakes on a plane: PLOT HOLES.
Snakes on a plane was equally as boring as little miss sunshine. I hear ben on how it was a joke, I didn't realize it till later (Like for example how when that dude put the snake in the microwave there was actually a button that said "snake") none the less, the movie was shitty. To me it seemed like a bunch of lazy asses who wanted to make a fast buck on a movie but had no idea how to actually write a good script getting together and making a film. Shitty ass graphics, a terrible plot line, tons of shit that just didn't make any sense. For example:
If Samuel L. Jackson knew that the main character witnessed the bad guy murder that guy, he probally would've witnessed the crime himself. The movie should explain how the hell Sam knew about the witness, how the hell Sam knew where the witness lived, and how the bad asian dude knew where the witness lived.
How did the bad guy know which plane the guy was going to be on? How did he know he woudln't miss his flight? Why didn't the government give the witness a special jet if he was as important as he was? Wouldn't the government put him on a plane that would be difficult for the bad guy to track the information?
Why the hell did he put a pile of aroused snakes (that had no promises of killing the witness) instead of sending a GUARANTEED missle there? There are more efficient ways of killing someone than putting a bunch of snakes on a plane.
Why the fuck did Sam shoot a hole in the wall of an airplane to get rid of the snakes? A hole in a plane (expecially one that continued expanding like it did) would destroy the airodynamics of the plane.
A guy who played a flight similator nintendo game sucessfully landed the plane.
Why the hell did Sam shoot at the witness with the snake attacking his chest at the end if the witness had a bulletproof vest on? He should've figured the bullet proof vest will protect him from the snake, shooting at another person is stupid and a police officer with common sense would never shoot at a snake attached to a persons chest EXPECIALLY if he had bullet proof armor on.
The problem is I could go on and on and on, i've only mentioned a few of countless flaws in the plot line, SEVERE flaws.
It may have been a funny movie for some people, but personally I would rather watch a comedy that is funny because it's clever, not because it was just a shitty movie and it's funny because of how shitty it is.
I have two words for snakes on a plane: PLOT HOLES.
Snakes on a plane was equally as boring as little miss sunshine. I hear ben on how it was a joke, I didn't realize it till later (Like for example how when that dude put the snake in the microwave there was actually a button that said "snake") none the less, the movie was shitty. To me it seemed like a bunch of lazy asses who wanted to make a fast buck on a movie but had no idea how to actually write a good script getting together and making a film. Shitty ass graphics, a terrible plot line, tons of shit that just didn't make any sense. For example:
If Samuel L. Jackson knew that the main character witnessed the bad guy murder that guy, he probally would've witnessed the crime himself. The movie should explain how the hell Sam knew about the witness, how the hell Sam knew where the witness lived, and how the bad asian dude knew where the witness lived.
How did the bad guy know which plane the guy was going to be on? How did he know he woudln't miss his flight? Why didn't the government give the witness a special jet if he was as important as he was? Wouldn't the government put him on a plane that would be difficult for the bad guy to track the information?
Why the hell did he put a pile of aroused snakes (that had no promises of killing the witness) instead of sending a GUARANTEED missle there? There are more efficient ways of killing someone than putting a bunch of snakes on a plane.
Why the fuck did Sam shoot a hole in the wall of an airplane to get rid of the snakes? A hole in a plane (expecially one that continued expanding like it did) would destroy the airodynamics of the plane.
A guy who played a flight similator nintendo game sucessfully landed the plane.
Why the hell did Sam shoot at the witness with the snake attacking his chest at the end if the witness had a bulletproof vest on? He should've figured the bullet proof vest will protect him from the snake, shooting at another person is stupid and a police officer with common sense would never shoot at a snake attached to a persons chest EXPECIALLY if he had bullet proof armor on.
The problem is I could go on and on and on, i've only mentioned a few of countless flaws in the plot line, SEVERE flaws.
It may have been a funny movie for some people, but personally I would rather watch a comedy that is funny because it's clever, not because it was just a shitty movie and it's funny because of how shitty it is.
